« Home | You talkin' to me? » | A subject never organizes itself » | Bark in the bush » | Size is relative » | Underexposure is the greatest generator of noise » | Better to overexpose then darken in RAW conversion » | Auto level and auto contrast » | Misty morning » | Stadium sundown » | Aperture »

Lens Contrast (Part 10 : Conclusion)


_DSC4487, originally uploaded by shutterhack.

Taken with a Nikon D50 and AF Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G lens

In my opinion, lens contrast of fairly large image structures is a primary determinant of subjective optical quality in a camera lens. The old Leica 7-element 50mm Summicron was optimized for high contrast at 5 lp/mm, for instance, and under favorable picture-taking circumstances (i.e., avoiding too much flare and too wide an aperture), these lenses can still yield glorious-looking pictures today.

Also, it's very interesting to note that high apparent lens contrast can be simulated digitally, and this may eventually prove to be an Achilles heel for silver-halide photography where viewer appeal of prints is concerned. "Sharpening" only improves visual microcontrast, of course, not actual resolution of detail. But resolution of very fine structures seldom helps pictorial photographs much, and, in my opinion, is an overrated property where lens quality is concerned.

Labels: , , ,